{"id":80,"date":"2010-09-23T21:56:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-23T21:56:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.halepassage.org\/?p=80"},"modified":"2010-09-25T06:46:00","modified_gmt":"2010-09-25T06:46:00","slug":"80","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.halepassage.org\/?p=80","title":{"rendered":"Interesting, but flawed, Dem\/Rep presidential comparison"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A few days ago, Allen Edwards posted on Facebook this thought-provoking comment:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<em>If  you took $10,000 to invest 50 years ago, and followed the pattern of   investing in the S&amp;P 500 during GOP presidencies, and at 5% in   bonds &amp; bank accounts during Democratic presidencies, you&#8217;d have   about $60,000 today. If you took the same $10,000 and reversed this,   investing in the S&amp;P only during Democratic presidencies, and   keeping it in bonds &amp; accounst earning 5% during GOP presidencies,   you&#8217;d have about $350,000 today.<\/em>&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I had to check it, of  course.\u00c2\u00a0 I downloaded monthly S&amp;P historical data from Yahoo for the  period 1960 to the\u00c2\u00a0 present, set up a spreadsheet to do the  calculations (ignoring dividends and compounding interest monthly), and  this is what I got:<\/p>\n<table border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"593\">\n<col width=\"214\"><\/col>\n<col width=\"191\"><\/col>\n<col width=\"188\"><\/col>\n<tbody>\n<tr height=\"29\">\n<td width=\"214\" height=\"29\"><\/td>\n<td colspan=\"2\" width=\"379\">Value at end of   President&#8217;s Term in\u00c2\u00a0 office<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"17\">\n<td height=\"17\"><\/td>\n<td rowspan=\"3\" width=\"191\">Invest in S&amp;P 500   with Dem Pres; 5% bonds with GOP Pres<\/td>\n<td rowspan=\"3\" width=\"188\">Invest in S&amp;P 500   with GOP Pres; 5% bonds with Dem Pres<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"17\">\n<td height=\"17\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"17\">\n<td height=\"17\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"17\">\n<td height=\"17\">Starting amount:<\/td>\n<td>10,000<\/td>\n<td>10,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"17\">\n<td height=\"17\">End of term of:<\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"17\">\n<td height=\"17\">Kennedy\/Johnson<\/td>\n<td>18,600<\/td>\n<td>14,700<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"17\">\n<td height=\"17\">Ford<\/td>\n<td>25,500<\/td>\n<td>15,400<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"17\">\n<td height=\"17\">Carter<\/td>\n<td>33,300<\/td>\n<td>18,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"17\">\n<td height=\"17\">Reagan<\/td>\n<td>49,600<\/td>\n<td>39,700<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"17\">\n<td height=\"17\">Bush 41<\/td>\n<td>61,100<\/td>\n<td>60,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"17\">\n<td height=\"17\">Clinton<\/td>\n<td>189,100<\/td>\n<td>84,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"17\">\n<td height=\"17\">Bush 43<\/td>\n<td>227,500<\/td>\n<td>56,200<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"17\">\n<td height=\"17\">Obama (Sept &#8217;10)<\/td>\n<td>351,100<\/td>\n<td>60,800<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Note that the big changes occur during Clinton&#8217;s term and Bush 43&#8217;s term &#8212; investing in the S&amp;P while Clinton was in the White House tripled your portfolio, and getting out of the market during Bush 43&#8217;s term allowed you to keep it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Edit<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I should have also posted what you would have if you left your money in the S&amp;P 500 for the entire time &#8212; you&#8217;d have $204,000.\u00c2\u00a0 If your investment strategy was to get out of the market whenever a Democrat was president, you&#8217;d have paid a severe penalty for missing the Clinton\u00c2\u00a0 years.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Another Edit<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This really doesn&#8217;t say anything about which party is better for the market.\u00c2\u00a0 The gain during Clinton&#8217;s presidency was due to the dot-com bubble; the loss during Bush was due to the collapse of the housing bubble and resulting financial crisis.\u00c2\u00a0 One could argue that the collapse was because of Republican policies, but that&#8217;s another story.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A few days ago, Allen Edwards posted on Facebook this thought-provoking comment: &#8220;If you took $10,000 to invest 50 years ago, and followed the pattern of investing in the S&amp;P 500 during GOP presidencies, and at 5% in bonds &amp; &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.halepassage.org\/?p=80\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-80","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.halepassage.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.halepassage.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.halepassage.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.halepassage.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.halepassage.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=80"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.halepassage.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.halepassage.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=80"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.halepassage.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=80"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.halepassage.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=80"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}